to main content Plans - Management Plans vs. Policies/Procedures | Ambulatory | Environment of Care EC | The Joint Commission
Plans - Management Plans vs. Policies/Procedures

How do management plans differ from policies and procedures?

Any examples are for illustrative purposes only.

Management plans are not operational policies but provide a high-level framework for managing the environment of care (the physical environment). In other words, management plans should be a roadmap/outline to describe how the standards apply to the organization, and then describe how the organization will comply with the applicable standards. 

Management plans should include, at a minimum:
  • All facilities, spaces, equipment, people
  • How risk is managed through planning, implementing, evaluating and evaluation of results
  • Specific risks and unique conditions
  • Scope, objectives, staff responsibilities and time frame for identified activities
  • How leased spaces are addressed if care, treatment and services are conducted in those spaces
These are used as a guide to maintain ongoing environment of care standards compliance through meetings, reporting, data collection, communications, so that at the end of a 12-month period, the environment of care program can be effectively evaluated. Therefore, environment of care management plans are required be reviewed annually (EC.04.01.01).  Data collected is analyzed in order to identify opportunities for improvement and to resolve issues.

Policies are a set of rules around which work is accomplished.  Plans provide the overview for the work done considering the policy.  

For example, some organizations create a single, overarching policy to provide authority for and enforcement of the management plans.  These management plans are dynamic documents which can be modified more readily than a policy.  Additionally, management plans may reference several policies, procedures or other documents.  Some organizations choose to have all plans in policy form.  It is up to the organization to determine the best structure and format of their management plans to address their individual needs and circumstances.

Reference: EC.01.01.01 
Manual: Ambulatory
Chapter: Environment of Care EC
First published date: April 11, 2016 This Standards FAQ was first published on this date.
This page was last updated on May 30, 2023 with update notes of: Editorial changes only Types of changes and an explanation of change type: Editorial changes only: Format changes only. No changes to content. | Review only, FAQ is current: Periodic review completed, no changes to content. | Reflects new or updated requirements: Changes represent new or revised requirements.
Was this response helpful?

If no, please comment on how we could improve this response.

If you have additional standards-related questions regarding this topic, please use the Standards Online Submission Form

Get Extra Help with Books and E-books

Browse our gallery of books and e-books to find trusted prep and readiness resources, practical checklists and toolkits, and resources on specialized health care topics.

Stay Informed with Online Education

Online education is the most convenient and cost-effective way to educate your staff and minimize expenses without the need to leave your organization.

Reach Your Safety Goals with eProducts

Assessing and sustaining compliance with accreditation standards or CMS CoPs can be a challenge, but it doesn’t have to be. Rely on our proven software solutions developed by our team of industry experts.

Can't Find What You're Looking For?

If you do not find an answer to your question, please contact the Standards Interpretation Group (SIG).

Note: To provide adequate support to those organizations that are either accredited/certified or seeking accreditation/certification, we will only answer those questions submitted by those organizations seeking accreditation/certification or currently accredited/certified by the Joint Commission. The Joint Commission no longer answers questions submitted by students or vendors. Thank you for your understanding.