to main content Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE) - Understanding the Requirements | Critical Access Hospital | Medical Staff MS | The Joint Commission
Coronavirus Resources

  • Careers
  • Contact Us
Main Menu
The Joint Commission
Visit Joint Commission ResourcesVisit Joint Commission InternationalVisit the Center for Transforming HealthcareQuality CheckWorld Hospital Search
Search Toggle
Login
  • Accreditation & Certification
    Joint Commission accreditation can be earned by many types of health care organizations.
    • Why The Joint Commission
    • Health Care Settings
      • Ambulatory Health Care
      • Assisted Living Communities
      • Behavioral Health Care and Human Services
      • Critical Access Hospital
      • Home Care
      • Hospital
      • Laboratory Services
      • Nursing Care Center
      • Pharmacy
    • Become Accredited
      • What is Accreditation
      • Learn the Process
    • Accreditation Guide
    • Accredited
      • Accreditation Milestones
      • Accreditation Resources
      • Publicity Kit
      • Accreditation Announcements and Updates
    • Certification
      • What is Certification
      • Certifications by Setting
      • Explore Eligibility
      • Learn the Process
      • After your Review
      • Certifications without Accreditation
    • Payor Relations
      • Payor Resources
    • State Recognition
    • Verification
      • Improve Maternal Outcomes at Your Healthcare Facility
      • Maternal Levels of Care Verification
      • Publicity Kit
    Senior couple talking with doctor.

    Why Achieve Accreditation

    Learn more about why your organization should achieve Joint Commission Accreditation.

    Shot of a senior woman in a wheelchair being cared for a nurse

    Certifications by Setting

    See what certifications are available for your health care setting.

  • Standards
    Set expectations for your organization's performance that are reasonable, achievable and survey-able.
    • About Our Standards
    • Standards Field Reviews
      • Field Review for Proposed Requirement for an EM surge management plan
    • National Patient Safety Goals
      • Ambulatory Health Care: 2022 National Patient Safety Goals
      • Assisted Living Community: 2022 National Patient Safety Goals
      • Behavioral Health Care and Human Services: 2022 National Patient Safety Goals
      • Critical Access Hospital: 2022 National Patient Safety Goals
      • Home Care: 2022 National Patient Safety Goals
      • Hospital: 2022 National Patient Safety Goals
      • Laboratory Services: 2022 National Patient Safety Goals
      • Nursing Care Center: 2022 National Patient Safety Goals
      • Office-Based Surgery: 2022 National Patient Safety Goals
    • Prepublication Standards
      • New and Revised Requirements Addressing Antibiotic Stewardship for the Hospital and Critical Access Hospital Programs
      • New and Revised Requirements to Reduce Health Care Disparities
      • New COVID-19 Staff Vaccination Standard
      • New Requirements for the Advanced Certification in Perinatal Care
      • Requirements Revised for Home Health Agencies
      • Revisions Related to CMS Changes for Hospices
      • Revisions Resulting from the Hospital Deeming Application
      • Revisions to EC020301 EP 9 for CAH and HAP
      • Updates to Assisted Living Community Accreditation Requirements
      • Additional Requirements for Primary Stroke Centers that Perform Mechanical Thrombectomy
      • New and Revised Emergency Management Standards
      • Revisions to the Environment of Care Chapter
      • Revisions to the Environment of Care Chapter for Freestanding Inpatient Hospices
      • Revisions to the RI Standards
      • Updates to the Advanced Disease-Specific Care Certification Programs for Heart Attack
      • Updates to the Nursing Care Center Accreditation and the Memory Care Certification Requirements
    • R3 Report
      • R3 Report Issue 36: New Requirements to Reduce Health Care Disparities
      • R3 Report Issue 35: New and Revised Requirements for Antibiotic Stewardship
      • R3 Report Issue 34: New and Revised Standards in Emergency Management
      • R3 Report Issue 33: Nursing Care Center Accreditation Standards
      • R3 Report Issue 32: New Standard for Water Management Program
      • R3 Report Issue 31: New and Revised Performance Improvement Accreditation Standards
      • R3 Report Issue 30: Workplace Violence Prevention Standards
      • R3 Report Issue 29: Resuscitation Standards for Hospitals
      • R3 Report Issue 28: Resuscitation Standards for Critical Access Hospitals
      • R3 Report Issue 27: New and Revised Standards for Child Welfare Agencies
      • R3 Report Issue 26: Advanced Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement Certification Standards
      • R3 Report Issue 25: Enhanced Substance Use Disorders Standards for Behavioral Health Organizations
      • R3 Report Issue 24: PC Standards for Maternal Safety
      • R3 Report Issue 23: Antimicrobial Stewardship in Ambulatory Health Care
      • R3 Report Issue 22: Pain Assessment and Management Standards for Home Health Services
      • R3 Report Issue 21: Pain Assessment and Management Standards for Nursing Care Centers
      • R3 Report Issue 20: Pain Assessment and Management Standards for Behavioral Health Care
      • R3 Report Issue 19: National Patient Safety Goal for Anticoagulant Therapy
      • R3 Report Issue 18: National Patient Safety Goal for Suicide Prevention
      • R3 Report Issue 17: Distinct Newborn Identification Requirement
      • R3 Report Issue 16: Pain Assessment and Management Standards for Office-Based Surgeries
      • R3 Report Issue 15: Pain Assessment and Management Standards for Critical Access Hospitals
      • R3 Report Issue 14: Pain Assessment and Management Standards for Ambulatory Care
      • R3 Report Issue 13: Revised Outcome Measures Standard for Behavioral Health Care
      • R3 Report Issue 12: Maternal Infectious Disease Status Assessment and Documentation Standards for Hospitals and Critical Access Hospitals
      • R3 Report Issue 11: Pain Assessment and Management Standards for Hospitals
      • R3 Report Issue 10: Housing Support Services Standards for Behavioral Health Care
      • R3 Report Issue 9: New and Revised NPSGs on CAUTIs
      • R3 Report Issue 8: New Antimicrobial Stewardship Standard
      • R3 Report Issue 7: Eating Disorders Standards for Behavioral Health Care
      • R3 Report Issue 6 - Memory care accreditation requirements for nursing care centers
      • R3 Report Issue 5: Alarm System Safety
      • R3 Report Issue 4: Patient Flow Through the Emergency Department
      • R3 Report Issue 3: Influenza Vaccination
      • R3 Report Issue 2: CAUTI
      • R3 Report Issue 1: Patient-Centered Communication
    • Standards FAQs
    • Universal Protocol
    • Patient Safety Systems PS Chapter
    Nurse and doctor talking to happy hospital patient after surgery

    National Patient Safety Goals

    Find out about the current National Patient Safety Goals® (NPSGs) for specific programs.

    doctor chatting to sales rep in hospital corridor

    FAQs about the Standards

    We help you measure, assess and improve your performance.

  • Measurement
    Learn about the "gold standard" in quality. We develop and implement measures for accountability and quality improvement.
    • Measures
      • Assisted Living Community Measures
      • Cardiac Care
      • Emergency Department
      • Health Care Staffing Services
      • Hospital Outpatient Department
      • Hospital-Based Inpatient Psychiatric
      • Immunization
      • Palliative Care
      • Perinatal Care
      • Spine Surgery
      • Stroke
      • Substance Use
      • Tobacco Treatment
      • Total Hip and Knee Replacement
      • Venous Thromboembolism
    • Specifications Manuals
      • Electronic Clinical Quality Measures
      • Chart Abstracted Measures
    • Reporting
      • Accreditation - ORYX
      • Certification
    • Pioneers in Quality
      • Facts
      • Proven Practices
      • Expert to Expert Series
      • Recognition
    • Resources
    • ORYX FAQs
      • 1. What is New
      • 2. General ORYX Information Basics
      • 3. General ORYX Information Feedback and Public Reporting
      • 4. Measure Requirements Chart and eCQM
      • 5. Measure Requirements By Hospital Type
      • 6. Perinatal Care
      • 7. Safe Use of Opioids page
      • 8. Direct Data Submission Platform Overview
      • 9. Direct Data Submission Platform General Information
      • 10. Direct Data Submission Platform Technical
      • References
    • Quality Measurement Webinars & Videos
      • Video Shorts
    Business information and info-graphics concept.

    Measures

    Learn about the development and implementation of standardized performance measures. View them by specific areas by clicking here.

    Happy Medical Team Looking at Laptop in Doctor's Office.

    Pioneers in Quality

    Gain an understanding of the development of electronic clinical quality measures to improve quality of care.

  • Performance Improvement
    Providing you tools and solutions on your journey to high reliability.
    • The Joint Commission
      • Continuing Education Credit Information
      • DASH
      • Leading the Way to Zero
      • Robust Process Improvement
    • Patient Safety Topics
    • Center for Transforming Healthcare
    • Joint Commission International
    • Joint Commission Resources
    Science formula and math equation abstract background.

    DASH

    Drive performance improvement using our new business intelligence tools.

    Group of young creative people collaborating in modern office.

    Robust Process Improvement

    Discover how different strategies, tools, methods, and training programs can improve business processes.

  • Resources
    Obtain useful information in regards to patient safety, suicide prevention, pain management, infection control and many more.
    • Cybersecurity Alert
    • Patient Safety Topics
      • Emergency Management
      • Health Equity
      • Infection Prevention and Control
      • Pain Management
      • Patient Safety
      • Report a Patient Safety Concern or Complaint
      • Sentinel Event
      • Suicide Prevention
      • The Physical Environment
      • Workplace Violence Prevention
    • News & Multimedia
      • The Joint Commission Stands for Racial Justice and Equity
      • Blogs
      • Joint Commission Saves Lives
      • Events
      • Fact Sheets
      • Newsletters
      • News Releases
      • Podcasts
      • Speakers Bureau
      • Video Resources
      • Webinars
    • For Nurses
    • For Physicians
      • Physician Leader Monthly June 2022
      • Physician Leader Monthly May 2022
      • Physician Leader Monthly April 2022
      • Physician Leader Monthly March 2022
      • Physician Leader Monthly February 2022
      • Physician Leader Monthly January 2022
      • Physician Leader Monthly December 2021
      • Physician Leader Monthly November 2021
      • Physician Leader Monthly October 2021
      • Physician Leader Monthly September 2021
      • Physician Leader Monthly August 2021
      • Physician Leader Monthly July 2021
    • For Consumers
      • Speak Up Campaigns
      • COVID-19 Vaccines
      • TakeCHARGE
      • The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
      • The Smart Parents Guide
      • You The Smart Patient
    • Research
      • Operations Support Research
      • Evaluation Research
      • Health Services Research
    • E-Alerts Signup
    • Awards
      • John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Award
      • Bernard J. Tyson National Award for Excellence in Pursuit of Healthcare Equity
    Talking to audience.  One member of the board speaking in microphone among other participants of meeting.

    News & Multimedia

    Stay up to date with all the latest Joint Commission news, blog posts, webinars, and communications.

    Cheerful female spouse handing crutches to partner while he is sitting down on hospital bed both smiling

    Pain Management

    Learn about pain assessment and management standards for accredited organizations.

  • About Us
    Through leading practices, unmatched knowledge and expertise, we help organizations across the continuum of care lead the way to zero harm.
    • 70 Years
    • Evolving with Care
    • Facts About The Joint Commission
      • History of The Joint Commission
      • Joint Commission FAQs
      • Board of Commissioners
      • Joint Commission Advisory Groups
      • Quality Check and Quality Reports
    • Policies and Financials
      • Code of Conduct
      • Conflict of Interest Policy
      • Designated Copyright Agent Policy
      • Financial Statements
      • Firewall Policy Summary
      • Linking to The Joint Commission Website
      • Public Information Policy
      • Reprint Permission Policy
    • Federal Relations and Public Policy
    • DataMart
    • Joint Commission Connect Request Guest Access
    • The Joint Commission and Social Media
    • Joint Commission Officers
      • Jonathan B. Perlin
      • David Baker
      • Brian Enochs
      • Michael Kaba
      • Kin Lee
      • Ana Pujols McKee
      • Mark Pelletier
      • Paige Rodgers
      • Margaret VanAmringe
      • Lisa Vandecaveye
    The Joint Commission

    Facts About The Joint Commission

    Learn more about us and the types of organizations and programs we accredit and certify.

    FAQ, ask questions online, what where when how and why, search information.

    Joint Commission FAQs

    Get answers to commonly asked questions.

  1. Home >
  2. Standards >
  3. Standards FAQs >
Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE) - Understanding the Requirements
Print

What are the key elements needed to meet the Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE) requirements?

Back to FAQs
Any examples are for illustrative purposes only.

Intent
OPPE identifies professional practice trends that may impact the quality and safety of care and applies to all practitioners granted privileges via the Medical Staff chapter requirements. A well-designed process supports early detection and response to performance issues that could negatively impact patient outcomes.  

Goals
The goals include:
  • A qualitative and quantitative data-driven process to identify performance trends that may require taking steps to improve performance (e.g. implementing an FPPE review).
  • Establishing an objective, data-driven foundation for making re-privileging decisions.
Design
 clearly-defined process that includes elements, such as:
  • Responsibilities for data review, as defined by the medical staff that may include:
    • Department chair or the department as a whole 
    • Credentialing committee 
    • Medical Executive Committee 
    • Special committee of the organized medical staff 
  • Frequency of review 
  • The process for using data for decision-making
  • The decision process resulting from the review (continue/limit/deny privilege)
Frequency of Review
The organized medical staff defines the frequency for data collection.  However, the timeframe for review of the data cannot exceed every 12 months.  

Data
Qualitative and quantitative criteria (data) that has been approved by the medical staff, should be designed into the process. For example, limiting criteria to quantitative data  may only represent the presence or absence of information but may not reflect the quality of the information reviewed.  Consider the following:

Qualitative Data
Qualitative or 'categorical' data, may be described as data that 'approximates and characterizes' and is often non-numerical in nature. This type of data may be collected through methods of observations, discussion with other individuals, chart review, monitoring of diagnostic and treatment techniques, etc.  
Examples(^) may include, but are not limited to:
•    Description of procedures performed
•    Periodic Chart Review
o    quality/accuracy of documentation
o    appropriateness of tests ordered / procedures performed
o    patient outcomes
•    Types of patient complaints
•    Code of conduct breaches
•    Peer recommendations
•    Discussion with other individuals involved in the care of patient(s), e.g. consultants, surgical assistants, nursing, administration, etc. 
 
When the data being collected is related to the quality of performance, e.g., appropriate management of a patient's presenting condition, or the quality of the performance of a procedure, then the organized medical staff should determine that someone with essentially equal qualifications would review the data.

Quantitative Data
Quantitative data often reflects a certain quantity, amount or range and are generally expressed as a unit of measure.  Contrasted with qualitative data, quantitative data generally relates to data in the form of numerical quantities such as measurements, counts, percentage compliant, ratios, thresholds, intervals, time frames, etc. 
Examples(^) may include, but are not limited to:
  • Length of stay trends
  • Post-procedure infection rates
  • Periodic Chart Review
  • Dating/timing/signing entries
  • T.O./V.O. authenticated within defined time frame
  • Presence/absence of required information (H & P elements, etc)
  • Number of H & P / updates completed within 24 hours after inpatient admission/registration
  • Compliance with medical staff rules, regulations, policies, etc.
  • Documenting the minimum required elements of an H & P / update.
  • Compliance with core measures
^ Note: The manner in which such data is captured could represent either – or both – qualitative and quantitative information. 

Data Sources
The data source used for the OPPE process must include practitioner activities performed at the organization where privileges have been requested. This may include activities performed at any location that falls under the organization's single CMS Certification Number (CCN). For example, if an organization operates two hospitals that fall under the same CCN number, data from both hospital locations may be used.

Multi-hospital Systems
In multi-hospital systems where each hospital operates independently under separate CMS Certification Numbers (CCN), data from those entities may be used to supplement local data.

Low-volume Practitioners
When practitioner activity at the 'local' level is low or limited, supplemental data may be used from another CMS-certified organization where the practitioner holds the same privileges. The use of supplemental data may NOT be used in lieu of a process to capture local data.  Organizations choosing to use supplemental data should assess and determine the supplemental data's relevance, timeliness, and accuracy.

Examples where supplemental data could be used may include, but are not limited to: 
  • activity is limited to periodic on-call coverage for other physicians or groups
  • occasional consultations for a clinical specialty
Consistent with the "Medical Staff" chapter, the medical staff must develop policies and procedures which ensure oversight of local data and the use of supplemental data.

OPPE for non-inpatient areas
  • Privileges need to be granted to anyone providing a medical level of care, i.e., making medical diagnoses or medical treatment decisions, in any setting that is included within the scope of the hospital survey. The settings can include inpatient, on-campus outpatient, off campus clinics, hospital owned physician office practices, etc.
  • OPPE applies to any privileges granted to be exercised in any setting and/or location included within the scope of the hospital survey. The privileges are often the same as those for inpatient care, treatment, and services, therefore, separate privileges based on 'location' would not be required. If the non-inpatient settings do not have the same clinical record system or information technology, collecting data may be more difficult, but if the privileges are the same,  the data collected should be the same.
Using the Data in Decision-making
The information resulting from the evaluation needs to be used to determine whether to continue, limit, or revoke any existing privilege(s) at the time the information is analyzed.  Based on the analysis, several possible actions could occur, for example:
  • determining that the practitioner is performing well or within desired expectations and that no further action is warranted
  • determining that a performance issues exists and requires a focused evaluation – see MS.08.01.01 EP 5.
  • revoking the privilege because it is no longer required
  • suspending the privilege, which suspends the data collection, and notifying the practitioner that if they wish to reactivate it, they must request a reactivation
Evidence of these determinations would need to be available at the time data is reviewed.



 
Manual: Critical Access Hospital
Chapter: Medical Staff MS
Last reviewed by Standards Interpretation: February 04, 2022 Represents the most recent date that the FAQ was reviewed (e.g. annual review).
First published date: April 11, 2016 This Standards FAQ was first published on this date.
This page was last updated on February 04, 2022 with update notes of: Review only, FAQ is current Types of changes and an explanation of change type: Editorial changes only: Format changes only. No changes to content. | Review only, FAQ is current: Periodic review completed, no changes to content. | Reflects new or updated requirements: Changes represent new or revised requirements.
Back to FAQs

If no, please comment on how we could improve this response.

If you have additional standards-related questions regarding this topic, please use the Standards Online Submission Form
Surgeons in an operating room

Additional Resources

Train your staff with a tool to quickly and efficiently assess standards compliance with our 2022 Hospital Compliance Assessment Workbook.

Additional hospital resources
A group of medical professionals have a discussion in a meeting room

Hospital Webinars

Keep learning with our Hospital Breakfast Briefings Webinar Series. Get a deep dive into our standards, chapter-by-chapter, individually or as a team.

Hospital Breakfast Briefings
Female doctor using digital tablet in her office.

Looking for Standards?

Get key information your hospital needs to achieve and maintain continuous standards compliance and experience operational improvement.

Get the standards
Chat Bot Icon
Joint Commission Virtual Assistant
This site uses cookies and other tracking technologies to assist with navigation, providing feedback, analyzing your use of our products and services, assisting with our promotional and marketing efforts, and provide content from third parties. Get more information about cookies and how you can refuse them by clicking on the learn more button below. By not making a selection you will be agreeing to the use of our cookies.

  • Center for Transforming Healthcare
  • Joint Commission International
  • Joint Commission Resources
  • Quality Check
  • Visit us on Facebook facebook
  • Visit us on Twitter twitter
  • Visit us on LinkedIn linkedin
  • News Room
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

  • Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy & Cookies Statement
©2022 The Joint Commission, All Rights Reserved
The Joint Commission is a registered trademark of The Joint Commission.