Medication Dispensing - Use of Auto-verification Technology
Would it be acceptable for an organization to establish a process where a select type of medications are auto-verified thus reducing the need for pharmacy review?
Any examples are for illustrative purposes only.
No, it would not be acceptable to establish a blanket practice that select medications ordered are auto-verified. The Joint Commission requires that a pharmacist reviews all medication orders or prescriptions, with limited exceptions as described in the 'notes' at *MM.05.01.01 EP 1.
The requirement and 'notes' found at MM.05.01.01 EP 1 do allow for limited situations where prospective pharmacy review may not be feasible or required. For example, if waiting for pharmacy review would create a delay that could result in patient harm, prospective review would not be expected. However, organizations should have a process in place to review these scenarios to ensure such a practice is limited to urgent scenarios and not a standard practice for convenience.
Another example may be when a licensed practitioner (LP) controls the ordering, preparation, and administration of a medication, such as in an emergency department. In this example, use of auto-verification technology may be considered as the LP would be physically present.
*This does not apply to the discontinuation of orders.
No, it would not be acceptable to establish a blanket practice that select medications ordered are auto-verified. The Joint Commission requires that a pharmacist reviews all medication orders or prescriptions, with limited exceptions as described in the 'notes' at *MM.05.01.01 EP 1.
The requirement and 'notes' found at MM.05.01.01 EP 1 do allow for limited situations where prospective pharmacy review may not be feasible or required. For example, if waiting for pharmacy review would create a delay that could result in patient harm, prospective review would not be expected. However, organizations should have a process in place to review these scenarios to ensure such a practice is limited to urgent scenarios and not a standard practice for convenience.
Another example may be when a licensed practitioner (LP) controls the ordering, preparation, and administration of a medication, such as in an emergency department. In this example, use of auto-verification technology may be considered as the LP would be physically present.
*This does not apply to the discontinuation of orders.
Manual:
Critical Access Hospital
Chapter:
Medication Management MM
Last reviewed by Standards Interpretation: November 17, 2022
Represents the most recent date that the FAQ was reviewed (e.g. annual review).
First published date: June 01, 2021
This Standards FAQ was first published on this date.
This page was last updated on August 14, 2023
with update notes of: Review only, FAQ is current
Types of changes and an explanation of change type:
Editorial changes only: Format changes only. No changes to content. |
Review only, FAQ is current: Periodic review completed, no changes to content. |
Reflects new or updated requirements: Changes represent new or revised requirements.
Get Extra Help with Books and E-books
Browse our gallery of books and e-books to find trusted prep and readiness resources, practical checklists and toolkits, and resources on specialized health care topics.
Stay Informed with Online Education
Online education is the most convenient and cost-effective way to educate your staff and minimize expenses without the need to leave your organization.
Reach Your Safety Goals with eProducts
Assessing and sustaining compliance with accreditation standards or CMS CoPs can be a challenge, but it doesn’t have to be. Rely on our proven software solutions developed by our team of industry experts.
Joint Commission Virtual Assistant