Surgical Site Infections (SSI) - Surveillance and Resources
Are organizations required to conduct surveillance on all surgical procedures, or is targeted surveillance acceptable ?
Any examples are for illustrative purposes only.
No, there is no requirement that all surgical procedures be included in an organization's surveillance for surgical site infections (SSI). We expect organizations to follow a hierarchical approach when establishing infection surveillance. We would first expect organizations to follow applicable federal and state law and regulation, then if deemed or required by state regulation, to follow CMS requirements. Some states have specified surgical procedures for which surveillance must be performed. If mandated by your state, then the Joint Commission would expect your organization to be compliant to that requirement.
In the absence of federal/state mandates for specific surgical site infection surveillance requirements, organizations may choose to target SSI surveillance based on the results of a risk assessment. If an organization's risk assessment shows that risk is greatest for certain procedures or settings, the surveillance program may be targeted to focus resources on those high-risk procedures. Organizations may wish to consider conducting periodic risk assessments to ensure that the scope of the targeted procedures included in surveillance activities remains current. Conducting a risk assessment is a helpful way of identifying risks associated with various procedures performed. A proactive risk assessment examines a process in detail including sequencing of events, actual and potential risks, and failure or points of vulnerability and that prioritizes, through a logical process, areas for improvement based on the actual or potential impact (that is, criticality) of care, treatment, or services provided.
The introductory section of the Leadership (LD) chapter provides an example of a pro-active risk assessment model that an organization may use. However, this specific approach is not mandated as there are other risk assessment tools available that may better meet the needs of the organization. Other examples may include a root cause analysis, failure mode and effect analysis, plan/do/check/act process, etc., or combinations and variations.
The risk assessment should focus on all components of the surgical continuum, including – but not limited to - staff knowledge and competency, adoption of – and compliance with - evidence-based guidelines for reprocessing of instruments, policies and procedures, surgical attire, practitioner engagement, and patient education. Compliance with any state-specific reporting requirements should also be evaluated. From a quality and safety perspective, ensure that surgical procedures performed in all locations have been integrated into the organization-wide quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program.
Additional Resources
National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)
The Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare: Video - Tackling Surgical Site Infections
No, there is no requirement that all surgical procedures be included in an organization's surveillance for surgical site infections (SSI). We expect organizations to follow a hierarchical approach when establishing infection surveillance. We would first expect organizations to follow applicable federal and state law and regulation, then if deemed or required by state regulation, to follow CMS requirements. Some states have specified surgical procedures for which surveillance must be performed. If mandated by your state, then the Joint Commission would expect your organization to be compliant to that requirement.
In the absence of federal/state mandates for specific surgical site infection surveillance requirements, organizations may choose to target SSI surveillance based on the results of a risk assessment. If an organization's risk assessment shows that risk is greatest for certain procedures or settings, the surveillance program may be targeted to focus resources on those high-risk procedures. Organizations may wish to consider conducting periodic risk assessments to ensure that the scope of the targeted procedures included in surveillance activities remains current. Conducting a risk assessment is a helpful way of identifying risks associated with various procedures performed. A proactive risk assessment examines a process in detail including sequencing of events, actual and potential risks, and failure or points of vulnerability and that prioritizes, through a logical process, areas for improvement based on the actual or potential impact (that is, criticality) of care, treatment, or services provided.
The introductory section of the Leadership (LD) chapter provides an example of a pro-active risk assessment model that an organization may use. However, this specific approach is not mandated as there are other risk assessment tools available that may better meet the needs of the organization. Other examples may include a root cause analysis, failure mode and effect analysis, plan/do/check/act process, etc., or combinations and variations.
The risk assessment should focus on all components of the surgical continuum, including – but not limited to - staff knowledge and competency, adoption of – and compliance with - evidence-based guidelines for reprocessing of instruments, policies and procedures, surgical attire, practitioner engagement, and patient education. Compliance with any state-specific reporting requirements should also be evaluated. From a quality and safety perspective, ensure that surgical procedures performed in all locations have been integrated into the organization-wide quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program.
Additional Resources
National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)
The Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare: Video - Tackling Surgical Site Infections
Manual:
Office Based Surgery
Chapter:
Infection Prevention and Control IC
Last reviewed by Standards Interpretation: October 28, 2021
Represents the most recent date that the FAQ was reviewed (e.g. annual review).
First published date: September 25, 2017
This Standards FAQ was first published on this date.
This page was last updated on July 01, 2024
with update notes of: Editorial changes only
Types of changes and an explanation of change type:
Editorial changes only: Format changes only. No changes to content. |
Review only, FAQ is current: Periodic review completed, no changes to content. |
Reflects new or updated requirements: Changes represent new or revised requirements.
Get Extra Help with Books and E-books
Browse our gallery of books and e-books to find trusted prep and readiness resources, practical checklists and toolkits, and resources on specialized health care topics.
Stay Informed with Online Education
Online education is the most convenient and cost-effective way to educate your staff and minimize expenses without the need to leave your organization.
Reach Your Safety Goals with eProducts
Assessing and sustaining compliance with accreditation standards or CMS CoPs can be a challenge, but it doesn’t have to be. Rely on our proven software solutions developed by our team of industry experts.