to main content Medication Dispensing - Use of Auto-verification Technology | Hospital and Hospital Clinics | Medication Management MM | The Joint Commission
Medication Dispensing - Use of Auto-verification Technology

Would it be acceptable for an organization to establish a process where a select type of medications are auto-verified thus reducing the need for pharmacy review?

Any examples are for illustrative purposes only

No, it would not be acceptable to establish a blanket practice that select medications ordered are auto-verified. The Joint Commission requires that a pharmacist reviews all medication orders or prescriptions, with limited exceptions as described in the 'notes' at MM.05.01.01 EP 1. 

The requirement and 'notes' found at MM.05.01.01 EP 1 do allow for limited situations where prospective pharmacy review may not be feasible or required.  For example, if waiting for pharmacy review would create a delay that could result in patient harm, prospective review would not be expected. However, organizations should have a process in place to review these scenarios to ensure such a practice is limited to urgent scenarios and not a standard practice for convenience.

Another example may be when a licensed independent practitioner (LIP) controls the ordering, preparation, and administration of a medication, such as in an emergency department.  In this example, use of auto-verification technology may be considered as the LIP would be physically present.

Manual: Hospital and Hospital Clinics
Chapter: Medication Management MM
First published date: June 01, 2021 This Standards FAQ was first published on this date.
This page was last updated on October 25, 2021

If no, please comment on how we could improve this response.

If you have additional standards-related questions regarding this topic, please use the Standards Online Submission Form