Preventing ventilator-related deaths and injuries
As of January 2002, the Joint Commission has reviewed 23 reports of deaths or injuries related to long term ventilation--19 events resulted in death and four in coma. Of the 23 cases, 65 percent were related to the malfunction or misuse of an alarm or an inadequate alarm; 52 percent were related to a tubing disconnect; and 26 percent were related to dislodged airway tube. A small percentage of the cases were related to an incorrect tubing connection or wrong ventilator setting. None of the cases were related to ventilator malfunctions. As the percentages indicate, ventilator-related deaths and injuries are often related to multiple failures that lead to negative outcomes. The majority of the cases occurred in hospital Intensive Care Units (ICUs), followed by long term care facilities and hospital chronic ventilator units.
Root causes
Root cause analysis of the 23 cases reveals the following contributing factors:
|
Staffing |
|
|
Inadequate orientation/training process |
87 percent |
|
Insufficient staffing levels |
35 percent |
|
Communication breakdown |
|
|
Among staff members |
70 percent |
|
With patient/family |
9 percent |
|
Incomplete patient assessment |
|
|
Room design limits observation |
30 percent |
|
Delayed or no response to alarm |
22 percent |
|
Monitor change not recognized |
13 percent |
|
Equipment |
|
|
Alarm off or set incorrectly |
22 percent |
|
No alarm for certain disconnects |
22 percent |
|
Alarm no audible in all areas |
22 percent |
|
No testing of alarms |
13 percent |
|
Restraint failure (escape) |
13 percent |
|
Distraction (environmental noise) |
22 percent |
|
Cultural (hierarchy/intimidation) |
13 percent |
In addition, several organizations found that during the use of low airway pressure alarms only, some ventilators did not always respond to tubing disconnects at all levels of the airflow circuit. For example, the disconnected airway tube may fall into the bedding or against the patient's body, ventilation cycling continues and the ventilator continues to receive indications of correct air pressure.
Risk reduction strategies
|
"The AARC has long held that death and injury due to faulty alarms, inadequate alarm systems, alarm misuse, and airway disconnect is avoidable. The key are an informed and alert caregiver team." --Sam Giordano, executive director, American Association of Respiratory Care
|
Both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the American Association of Respiratory Care (AARC) have published guidelines for testing and evaluating ventilators. The FDA's Draft Reviewer Guidance for Ventilators (1) covers continuous ventilators, critical care ventilators, and electrically powered home care ventilators. The AARC is a professional membership association of respiratory therapists that focuses primarily on respiratory therapy education and research. The AARC Clinical Practice Guideline-Patient-Ventilator System Checks (2) cover the breadth of respiratory care procedures, including guidelines related to care of patients using mechanical ventilator support.
"The AARC has long held that death and injury due to faulty alarms, inadequate alarm systems, alarm misuse, and airway disconnect are avoidable," says Sam Giordano, executive director of the AARC. "The key are an informed and alert caregiver team." The AARC recommends that health care organizations undertake efforts to assure that:
- Professionals responsible for application, adjustment and monitoring of ventilators, alarm systems and airways, possess relevant education, and have undergone validated competency testing.
- Systems are in place to check ventilator and monitoring system performance before and during clinical use.
All devices and systems are maintained according to manufacturers' specification. This includes medical gas systems.
- A tracking system is in place to identify, analyze and remedy all ventilator-related incidents that lead to serious injury or death.
Protocols for the application and discontinuance of mechanical ventilation are in place.
- A mechanism is in place to track outcomes of all ventilator patients.
- Organized, periodic, ventilator-related continuing education is accessible to those professionals responsible for the many components of care directed to ventilator patients.
The AARC recommendations are in-line with the following risk reduction strategies identified by Joint Commission-accredited organizations that experienced a sentinel event related to ventilators:
- Improve and expand staff orientation and training on ventilators.
- Upgrade alarms and monitoring systems on ventilators.
- Institute team training.
- Establish new processes for alarm testing and verification of alarm settings.
- Establish new or redesigned alarm response procedures.
- Redesign rooms or units to improve observation of patient and ventilator.
- Improve and expand preventive maintenance on ventilators.
Recommendations
Joint Commission makes the following recommendations to help prevent ventilator-related deaths and injuries:
- Review orientation and training programs for job-specific, ventilator safety-related content and include in competency assessment process.
- Review staffing process to ensure effective staffing for ventilator patients at all times.
- Implement regular preventive maintenance and testing of alarm systems.
- Ensure that alarms are sufficiently audible with respect to distances and competing noise within the unit.
- Initiate interdisciplinary team training for staff caring for ventilator patients.
- Direct observation of ventilator-dependent patients is preferred in order to avoid over dependence on alarms.
Resources
- Food and Drug Administration, Draft Reviewer Guidance for Ventilators, http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/500.pdf
- American Association of Respiratory Care, AARC Clinical Practice Guideline-Patient-Ventilator System Checks, http://www.aarc.org/
Published for Joint Commission accredited organizations and interested health care professionals, Sentinel Event Alert identifies specific sentinel events, describes their common underlying causes, and suggests steps to prevent occurrences in the future.
During the on-site survey of accredited organizations, Joint Commission surveyors assess, for consultative purposes, the organization's familiarity with and use of Sentinel Event Alert information. Accredited organizations are expected to:
- Review and consider relevant information, if appropriate to the organization's services, from each Sentinel Event Alert.
- Consider information in an alert when designing or redesigning relevant processes.
- Evaluate systems in light of information in an alert.
- Consider standard-specific concerns.
- Implement relevant suggestions or reasonable alternatives or provide a reasonable explanation for not implementing relevant changes.
At this time, Joint Commission has placed a moratorium on using the organization's response to Sentinel Event Alert recommendations as the basis for scoring standards.
Setting the Standard for Quality in Health Care
The Joint Commission
Sentinel Event Hotline (630) 792-3700
Please route this issue to appropriate staff within your organization. Sentinel Event Alert may only be reproduced in its entirety and credited to The Joint Commission.